Agree or disagree with the assertion that the riddle of "the good" is equally as puzzling as the riddle of "the evil". ...[Show More]
3 years ago
I agree that both riddles are equally puzzling. The first reason is in their mutual exclusiveness. When someone's actions are good they are not evil and vice versa. Secondly, the existence of both are cognitive and pertaining to free will. This means that a person could choose good at one instance yet prefer evil in another instance. The two share an equal chance of occurrence and that is why the puzzle can't be solved (Brentano, 2009). Origin of either can't be explained without reference to the other and thus make them the opposite faces to the same coin. Literally taken every human has the two sides and different stimuli always determine what side exposes.
By Steve 3 years ago . Marked as helpful (824). Marked as unhelpful (702)
how do considerations for moral consequences change ones religious interpretation of history? ...
By lsmith · 2 years ago
A local art institution has decided it would like to undertake a new series of initiatives. Namely, this non-profit in the art space has decided...
By Antony Test acc · 2 years ago
(4) Summarize the two basic positions taken by Christian theologians on the question of Jesus' role in the salvation of ALL people. Be sur...
By gfrein65 · 2 years ago
(3) Christians have many different ideas about the end of the world and life after death. Scripture itself is not unequivocal about the de...
By gfrein65 · 2 years ago
(2) Give me your definition of prayer. Is it important to one's life as a Christian? Chapter 10 lists some "starting points" for pra...
By gfrein65 · 2 years ago