The prospect of an economic crisis in the US has drawn attention to their impact on the rest of the world. As the world's largest national economy, the United States are often called "locomotive of the world economy", but no one doubts that this engine to maintain his pace in recent years has been more and more dependence to China (Boccuti & Moon, 2003). For years, the globalization protagonists have made to the increasing dependence of the Chinese and US economies from each other - as evidence of mutual gains, for performance and dynamics of capitalism. This was taken as proof that global capitalism could spread social and economic favors in the south and east. Quick and cheap labor within China provided the United States with cheap consumer goods. Together with Chinese purchases of US government bonds was the case a powerful deflationary pressure which kept interest rates low in the United States. Cheap loans stimulated spending, which kept the US economy growing. Internationally, the production of China's industrial boom led to a thriving demand for energy, raw materials, and food. Thus, China transformed into an icon of the energy of capitalism and its expansion capabilities.

Even if we allow for the moment the bourgeois ideological aspects of this plan left out, yet the entire economic analysis is inherently problematic. As description of the resilience of the industrial cycle, which began in China turn of the century and in the US in 2001, it is true (Keyuan, 2000). However, a mistake was its belief that such development could spiral infinitely stability and momentum preserve - or at least, as long as China's villages are a reservoir of cheap labor.

Now the credit crunch has brought the US growth rates for holding. Attention is on whether China is an economy that is large enough to entrain the rest of the world even without permanently increasing exports to the United States (Keyuan, 2000). The concept thought possible, argues that China has "decoupled" from the US and could move above storm based on its internal development.