Assignment: Academic
Writing Project
Assignment Outline
Students are required to draft an academic essay over the course of
the first 8-9 weeks of the semester.
The paper will be drafted in phases, with opportunities for detailed feedback,
revision and improvement at each
phase. Since it is not possible to write a full academic paper in 1500 words (and the research required
for a f
...[Show More]
Assignment: Academic
Writing Project
Assignment Outline
Students are required to draft an academic essay over the course of
the first 8-9 weeks of the semester.
The paper will be drafted in phases, with opportunities for detailed feedback,
revision and improvement at each
phase. Since it is not possible to write a full academic paper in 1500 words (and the research required
for a full academic paper would exceed the workload
requirements for this course), the essays will follow
one of the following
formats:
1. Literature
review. Students can write a review of the literature in a specific topic area. This will need to be more than just a
series of paragraphs summarizing various papers – it will need to have a central thesis
(argument) and cite academic literature to support that argument (most likely, arguing what the
main takeaway of the literature is). So, ideally, for this kind of essay the student would identify an area of
literature where there is some debate,
with multiple papers taking different sides of an issue. The student’s essay
would then argue in support of one
side of the debate, citing and acknowledging literature on both sides of the debate, and in most
cases, ultimately coming down in support of one side.
2.
Research proposal. Students can write a proposal for
a specific research project. You can think
about this in a number of ways – as the narrative section of a research grant,
as a proposal that one would write to
receive permission to conduct research in a public sector or professional context, or as the proposal for a masters or PhD thesis.
3.
Persuasive essay. Students can use academic
literature to backup an argument about an issue
of economic interest. This could be a public policy issue, a business issue, or
a more academic issue. In any case,
the essay should be grounded in supporting a particular argument using economic
reasoning and supported
by credible academic
economic literature.
Students are encouraged to select an essay format that best fits
their personal and professional interests. The potential subject matter is broad. The core requirement is that the essay use economic
reasoning and argumentation to make its main points,
and be based on credible
academic economics literature.
In general the essays will have the following format:
introduction, evidence/exposition, conclusion. The introduction will motivate
the central argument (the “hook”), outline the main aspects of the essay, and argue for the importance of the essay.
The evidence/exposition is the meat
of the essay – it will bring the student’s research to bear, in outlining the
evidence for the main argument or point of the essay,
while the conclusion will succinctly tie up the essay.
The final submission will be capped at 1500 words, exclusive of
literature references. Format: double spaced, 12-point font, 2.5 cm margins.
Phases
The assignment will be completed
in phases. The phases are meant to build
on each other.
Phase 1 (400-750 words; 3/37 percent): due Thursday
25 March, 6pm (Week
4)
Students will write about a quarter to half of the essay for a first draft. This should involve a first attempt
at an introductory section, and at least
one section of the supporting evidence. It is
understood that students may
not have completed all the background research
by this stage, so the
evidence/exposition section may be incomplete. However it will present a first
attempt to giving the hook
for the essay and outlining the main
arguments.
The soft copy of the draft must be submitted online through Canvas
(by Thursday 25 March, 6pm) so the
course instructor can give feedback particularly on the economic topic and
reasoning in the essay. Phase 1
will be capped by having students participate in an in-class peer feedback session
(3%) during Week 5 lecture on
29 March.
Phase 2 (1500 words; 14/37 percent): due Thursday 15 April,
6pm (Week 6)
Students will fill out the full essay
for the second draft.
Phase 2 will be
capped by (i) students participating in an in-class
peer feedback session
(4%) and
(ii) having their essay read and receiving detailed written feedback
from the course tutor through submitting
the essay in soft copy through Canvas (10%).
Students are expected to revise their essay
in light of the tutor’s feedback and will have an opportunity to meet the tutor
to discuss their revision and any further changes.
Phase 3 (1500 words; 20/37 percent): due Thursday 6 May,
6pm (Week 9)
This is the final submission of the essay, to be submitted in soft
copy online through Canvas, to be graded by the course instructor.
Due Date
Due dates are as listed above. Several adjustments on the dates (by
the instructor) are possible as the semester
progresses.
Grading Weight
The academic essay carries 37% of the grading weight for the course.
Tips
How do you come up with new research ideas or areas to explore in
economics? Well, if it were easy we
would all have a shot at a Nobel Prize. Unfortunately it is not so easy, but
there are certain patterns we can follow:1
·
Be curious and critical. Don’t take what you read at
face value; always ask questions. Just because
someone wrote something doesn’t mean it’s “right”. Sharpen your filter for
ideas by learning from others, but also learn to trust
your instincts and unique perspective.
·
Gather new information. While you can get new research ideas from reading
the academic literature,
unless you work on methodology this is often not a great source of new ideas. Much more interesting can be broad
reading and exposure – to what’s going on in the world, what the media is chattering
about (in op-eds, etc.), what’s happening in
1 Here’s useful advice from some other academic economists on how to come
up with research ideas: Marc Bellemare,
UMN (http://marcfbellemare.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/BellemareHowtoPublish.pdf); Amy Finkelstein, MIT (http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/spischke/phds/Amy%20Finkelstein%20IAP%20talk%2007.ppt); Steve
Pischke, LSE (http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/spischke/phds/How%20to%20start.pdf).
other academic
fields, etc. What are interesting new trends/phenomena that aren’t easily
explained with current
results and knowledge?
·
Write it down! Things that seem intuitive
(including others’ arguments) sometimes don’t hold
water. Check for yourself!
·
Eventually we need to think about feasibility – can an idea work? Don’t push this filter
too early, but eventually it must come into play.
[Show Less]