write a 1½ page, typed, double-spaced
essay based on reading of literature in economic history. Essays may not be longer than 1 ½ typed, double-spaced pages.
2. read and cite at least two references.
3. In the instructor evaluation of student essays, the most important consideration is the force of argument in terms of accuracy, clarity, and cogency. Most student essays suffer from inaccuracy or lack of clarity caused by sloppy English or sloppy thinking—the two are hard to distinguish. Hence, good English usage counts insofar as it helps make for clear, careful writing. It is also important that student essays stick to the question—the length limitation allows no space to stray--and offer a cogent argument, backed by citation of sources. The format for citing sources is given on the course website, under the link “Reference format.” 

Essay question:
Gregory Clark argues that Europe, up to roughly 1800, through the early modern as well as medieval eras, was subject to Malthusian constraints. Others disagree with the applicability of the Malthusian model for all or part of that period. Grantham, for example, maintains that the key constraint on prosperity during European feudalism was not Malthusian, but the prevalence of market incentives. 

Contrast the views and evidence supplied by Grantham, as opposed to Clark. Which is more persuasive? Is the evidence sufficient to make either point of view persuasive?

George Grantham, "The Manse, The Manor and the Market: New Perspectives on the Medieval Agricultural Revolution"