Comments and Constructive Criticism

Article 1

The author’s vivid expression of the accounts given by a face to face method of gathering data is very specific. In the article, it is visible that the author has extensive knowledge as portrayed in his way of writing and the content in his work. However, the author lacks diversity in his content structure. From the first paragraph, there is a recognizable amount of repetition. One major point seems to be discussed in one view or from a single perspective. Moreover, the diversity of face-to-face interviews and research methods is not elaborated in an efficient manner. However, to a certain point. The author seems to have captured the attention of the reader in his very short article. His or her comparison between face-to-face and the internet based survey is shallowly explained (Ritchie et al., 2013). The comprehension of the significance of the researcher seeing the interviewee in reality has been given such a light touch.