THIS IS A DISCUSSION POST Please structure as a discussion and NOT a paper. Consider the following statement: In the application of the common law of negligence, there is a four part test which must be met under the standard set in Palsgraff. That standard was used to LIMIT corporate liability. What happens if manufacturers are held accountable for all injuries caused by the products they manufacture? Does your opinion change if the injuries occur to a child? What about when the product is being used for a purpose for which it was not intended, as when an oven is being used to heat a home during a power outage and a fire ensues? What are the social consequences of legislative limits to tort liability for manufacturing? Does a state which has a $$ limit on tort damages become more attractive to business thinking about relocating?