The stance in the paper divulges into the importance of the 1684 Peace of Westphalia on international law. The principal argument is that the latter holds a continuing influence of relevance in spite of the evolution of its system. The results of Peace of Westphalia have led to the institution of essential norms for the international system which also serves as an archetypal for international law and relations. The normative frameworks are inclusive of statehood, secular governments, and sovereignty. To argue the relevancy of the Westphalia, it is essential to provide a historical background. The realization of its impact will require and in-depth analysis of the events which transpired since the evaluation conducted would address the critical issues of its relevancy. Theorists in the field of International relations agree that states are essential actors, if not primary in international relations. Undeniably, the rift between liberalism and realism lies in the perceptions of Westphalia and its role. Realism has actively been considered a champion of state primacy, and it has been documented from the likes of realist precursors such as Machiavelli. Ancient realists viewed those international politics as a necessity for power politics. They also perceived the pursuit of attaining and maximization of resources limited in supply as a factor which results in an anarchic and war-ridden system. [Show Less]