Critical evaluation of a peer-reviewed primary research article (40pts)

This assignment is worth 40 points. To receive 40 points, you must submit a 2 to 3 page, single-spaced, typed (11 point font, 0.75 inch borders) response to the article outlined below. If you need assistance writing and editing, then go to the writing center (Library Classroom A). Your evaluation and commentary of the article must  be written in your own words and address the questions and promts posed below. If you have any questions about how to prepare the response, please see me (The earlier the better, so you will have time to incorporate changes.)

Focus on the abstract and introduction of the publication:

Commentary 

Part 1

1. Explain in your own words why the researchers conducted this study, what is the value in studying the system? What background information is included to inform you of the relevance, importance or potential implication of the study?

2. Restate the hypothesis and the researcher's predictions in your own words.

Focus on the Materials and Mehtods.